Legitimacy of Biden Win Buried by Objective Data –

Emerging information from the states render his victory less and less plausible.

What does all this evidence mean? IMHO — NOTHING. The fix is in, and has been for the past year. We are doomed to become a third world shit hole. Having just celebrated number 80 this past Friday, I’m almost to the point I don’t care anymore. If that POS Biden and his globalist’s cronies do end up where they should never even have come close to being, they can’t hurt me. However, my heart goes out to my children  and grand children. Likewise to all those Republican lower income families who will find themselves struggling even more having to pay for all the extravagant benefits everyone will lavishing enjoy on their behalf. For all you globalist progressives who made it all happen;, suck it up. My Trump Nation Flag will conti8nue to fly proudly under my American Flag on the pole. If that POS does end up in the Oval office, and all goes the way I fully expect it to in months or years, I want everyone who passes my house to know I had nothing to do with it.

From the American Spectator

David Catron

 

During the weeks following November 3, innumerable election experts and statistical analysts have pored over the voting data upon which former Vice President Joe Biden’s purported campaign victory ostensibly stands. A growing body of evidence ranging from straightforward ballot audits to complex quantitative analyses suggests that the tabulation of the votes was characterized by enough chicanery to alter the outcome of the election. Consequently, a consensus has gradually developed among the auditors of publicly available information released by the states, and it contradicts the narrative promulgated by the Democrats and the media. The more data experts see, the less convinced they are that Biden won.

Among the analysts who question the legitimacy of Biden’s victory is Dr. Navid Keshavarz-Nia, a cybersecurity expert whose technical expertise was touted by the New York Times last September and who has been described as a hero in the Washington Monthly. It’s unlikely that either publication will be singing his praises for his work pursuant to the recent election. His damning analysis of the electronic manipulation of votes that occurred in the early hours of November 4 appears in a sworn affidavit included with C.J. Pearson v. Kemp, a lawsuit filed by Attorney Sidney Powell in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. His nine-page affidavit (Exhibit 26) describes how it is possible to manipulate votes, where this occurred, and sums up his findings as follows:

I conclude with high confidence that the election 2020 data were altered in all battleground states resulting in hundreds of thousands of votes that were cast for President Trump to be transferred to Vice President Biden. These alterations were the result of systemic and widespread exploitable vulnerabilities in DVS, Scytl/SOE Software and Smartmatic systems that enabled operators to achieve the desired results. In my view, the evidence is overwhelming and incontrovertible.

Dr. Keshavarz-Nia is by no means the only expert to reach the conclusion that widespread vote-tampering occurred. This examination of the election results, for example, uses quantitative analysis to identify some very odd anomalies in the 2020 vote patterns. But it isn’t necessary to be a sophisticated statistician or cybersecurity expert possessed of arcane knowledge of how voting machines operate to see that enough ballot fraud occurred to change the election results in several states. That Keshavarz-Nia provides his findings in a sworn affidavit, under penalty of perjury, renders him highly credible. Still, his conclusions are rather opaque to anyone without an enormous amount of training and experience in his field. This requires many of us to take what he says on faith.

Bearing this in mind, Matt Braynard of the Voter Integrity Project (VIP) approached the 2020 results in a far less arcane fashion. His team analyzed publicly available data on absentee ballots, and he explained his findings in a way that any intelligent voter can understand. VIP looked at suspicious ballot activity in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. Among the most significant VIP findings involved people who changed their state of residence, yet voted absentee using their prior address. In Arizona, which Biden “won” by 10,457 votes, there were 19,997 questionable votes. In Georgia, which Biden “won” by 12,670 votes, VIP found 138,221 such votes. In Wisconsin, which Biden “won” by 20,608 votes, there were 26,673 such votes. As Braynard told the Epoch Times:

This election, it appears to me, has been decided by ballots that are highly questionable.… I can give you the list of the people who voted in this election, who filed National Change of Address cards in Georgia, moving themselves to another state.… I can also show you the subsequent state voter registrations of these individuals in other states, who then cast absentee ballots back in Georgia.… I have no confidence that Joe Biden is the deserved winner of this election.

Braynard has been asked to present the findings of the Voter Integrity Project to Monday’s hearing with members of Arizona’s legislature. Moreover, as Braynard tweeted Friday, “The VIP findings have also been included in court filings in PA, GA, MI, WI, and AZ, including declarations we collected.” Sunday, another tweet by Braynard revealed that the FBI has proactively requested VIP findings that may indicate illegal ballots.  Meanwhile, no discussion of 2020 election skulduggery is complete without a discussion of the Democrat precincts that record more votes than registered voters. Rep. Bill Posey (R-Fla.) tweeted the following on that perennial topic: “According to an affidavit in the MI lawsuit, one Michigan precinct/township had 781.91% turnout. How does this happen?”

Good question. No fewer than six precincts listed by Rep. Posey experienced turnout exceeding 120 percent. Another 10 allegedly enjoyed 100 percent turnout. This is an insult to the electorate’s intelligence, and it happened in Democrat precincts all across the nation. From World War II through 2016 average turnout in a presidential election was about 56 percent. Yet we are expected to believe that, in 2020, the national turnout was 66 percent. It simply does not pass the laugh test. This looks to be the result of widespread Democrat chicanery facilitated by high-handed flouting of federal, state, and county election laws. Joe Biden’s victory is no more legitimate than his plagiarized rhetoric or working-class credentials. His Potemkin presidency would be no more authentic than the man himself.

Have a nice week — if you can.

Originally posted 2020-12-14 10:47:39.

6 thoughts on “Legitimacy of Biden Win Buried by Objective Data –”

  1. No way that the two diametrically opposed political ideologies will result in a peaceable existence…I am genuinely concerned that the conflict pending will be different than any other that we have seen in our history.. During the last two internal conflicts between the loyalists and the rebels and the union supporters and the confederates, each side was willing to put on a uniform and follow most of the rules that governed warfare… Now only the mob will rule on both sides…. Violence will strike without warning eschewing large military staging and movement to contact formations…… Instead flash mobs, aided by big tech, will mount blitzkrieg style attacks with devastating violence…you have seen the rehearsals in places like Portland, Seattle, Kenosha, Dallas, Atlanta as well as the wolf packs that preyed upon MAGA supporters in DC most recently… Wish I were wrong but the logical brain tells me that I am not.

    1. Agree to a point Master Guns. It will be a blood bath, and won’t be the conservatives bleeding the most. Those terrorists in the cities you named haven’t a clue what a real battle is like until they meet up with a bunch of trained Vets under good leadership, which there is a plethora of everywhere. I can’t wait to see it. Furthermore, who is it calling for peace now, it ain’t us. It’s the liberal gang who want everything to be hunky dory after the POS takes office. They want us all to kiss and make up. Oh really? You want us to forget all the BS you have been doing with the help of the globalists and the MSM. Sorry folks, that ain’t about to happen, not from this fellow. I put up with all their BS for the past few years, and when all is said and done. I will really get heavy on the blog! We all kept our mouths basically shut for 8 years under the Obummer, it ain’t going to happen this time.

      1. Colonel,
        The violent Marxists have learned how to avoid surfaces and exploit gaps or weaknesses.. Plus they have had the pleasure of a permissive environment to operate in as police and other LEAs stand-back / stand-down in some cases and are directed not to confront with any real force…. This has also emboldened these tards.. The police in many of these democratic led cities have watched the leftists /Marxist mob actually assault people but not done anything that might have prevented the attack nor in some cases enforced the law after the assault.. The back lash yes, I agree with you will be severe, but many of our good people do not have the mindset needed to survive or defend themselves from the mob… The will to face danger and fight / defend others / survive an attack takes a commitment that few people possess naturally…The leftist conducting these attacks are organized and have been trained to attack what they see as an easy mark or lone target that they can quickly over-power…

        So here are some tips for everyone who may read these words…

        1.Don’t venture into a municipality that impedes your right to self defense with an equalizer…God made man and Sam Colt made them equal if you know what I mean…

        2. If you have to go into a municipality that restricts those rights then you must have at least 9 other friends who no matter what will not leave you behind NO MATTER WHAT.

        2a. Appoint one leader who is willing to accept the responsibility of the being the leader.. and part II of this is everyone supports their decisions before and during the actions… After action critiques can be done AFTER THE ACTION.

        3. Get trained in how to use anything and everything as a weapon to defend yourself. Fist, brick, bat, knife, handgun, rifle etc…

        4. Sustain that training by committing at least 1 hour a week to practicing that skill set, and if you plan on being or operating as a small group.. practice those skill sets as a group.. 1 hour is a minimum and by no means the optimum goal.

        5. Avoid if possible all confrontations that you can foresee, but if and when you can longer avoid confrontation decide and COMMIT to plan of offense or defense.. you must choose which one will give you best chance to win / survive.

        6. Accept the fact that injuries will occur and prepare yourself mentally that you can bleed and continue to fight…Winning the fight is the first and only priority after hostile action is initiated.

        PS. If the Tards want to venture into a community with a strong reputation for LAW and ORDER then doom on them. In recent history this type of incursion by them has been a disaster… But I say this again, they are learning and adapting…the kind of places they prefer are the kinds of places that you and I and most of the people I know try to avoid if at all possible. Weak leftist lead, urban population areas with more weak LEA leadership and almost no enforcement… When those places are finally fully saturated in the manure of the policies that they produce then the mob will turn against itself. In the meantime they will continue to prey on those who don’t put into practice the type of mindset needed to defeat the mob..

        1. Bravo Master Guns, you are, as always, right in the five ring. I would add one more item. Know your state law regarding your rights to defend yourself or run. I happen to live in a state with a “Stand Your Ground” law (Florida). I am not required to run away from a dangerous situation and am allowed to use whatever means available to defend myself, family, and property e.g., deadly force. What’s mine is mine. Not many states have this law. I know TX does; I don’t know how many others have it. I can tell you the cesspool of politics (IL) does not. You are required to use whatever means to leave the scene.

  2. I strongly agree that this election was rigged. Joe Biden & Kamala did not win the election. I followed the Trump rally’s and the crowds that showed up numbered in the thousands. Sleepy Joe was lucky if he got 20 people to show up on a good day! I really hope we have another election or the Supreme Court rules in Trump’s favor. Then its time to get Pelosi out of the Speakership of the House! Then Schumer!

    1. John, I would really love to see what you say happen, but I fear not. We are done, the communists bastards are winning. There is no law except “their” law. Biden won’t last a year, The Ho will become POTUS and it would not surprises me if she named Drunken dumbshit Pelosi as her VP. Can anyone imagine that Harris and Pelosi running our country? What sad state of affairs. What did we do wrong to allow our country turn into this lawless, third world shithole?

Comments are closed.